Profile Portfolio  
 
 
 
Warren Buffett - Berkshire Hathaway's Profile
track Pro  
 
Tracked by: 2991 members
Pro type: Advisor

Discuss Warren Buffett - Berkshire Hathaway
Log in or register to leave a message.
Left by Mustelo ( track member | ignore member ) - November 04, 12:26PM


Not exactly sure what you wish to compare, but a few characteristics to look for in companies that Buffett tends to look for would be low debt, a good return on equity, consistent earnings, and having an economic moat.
Left by bigdaddy1974 ( track member | ignore member ) - October 20, 10:20AM


new to tickerspy, can some one explain to me how to compare some of my stock choices to that of Warren Buffet? Thanks.
Left by tototo ( track member | ignore member ) - October 05, 07:46PM


cool
Left by temea1@yahoo.com ( track member | ignore member ) - September 18, 03:16PM


I happened to be new to the tickerspy. I found out of it just by accident. Can someone tell me how to use and to expect from this free service? thank you
Left by Mustelo ( track member | ignore member ) - September 08, 10:48AM


Yes, this seems to be up-to-date. Which purchases are you looking for? Keep in mind that these are purchases of common shares, and not special deals or other circumstances that Berkshire Hathaway may have with other entities or companies. I try to keep up-to-date alternative (other) investments and most recent holdings posted here: http://www.tickerspy.com/portfolio.php?pid=50369 and http://www.tickerspy.com/portfolio.php?pid=48066
Left by Sonador ( track member | ignore member ) - September 03, 11:04PM


Can somebody advise if this is the most up to date chart with Warrents stocks ? I dont see some stocks I know he has purchased.
Left by thomaspgt ( track member | ignore member ) - March 31, 12:18PM


when are first quarter earnings announced for brka? also what recent purches where made?
Left by plundstedt001 ( track member | ignore member ) - February 20, 12:18PM


Lets use the Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio as of 09/30/2008 as an example. How to reposition a $46 billion portfolio.pdf - by Peter Lundstedt, CIO, Portfolio Strategist How to reposition a $46 billion portfolio, to yield a higher rate of return (in my opinion). From: Peter Lundstedt, CIO, Equity Portfolio Strategist, Greenwich Asset Management Group, LLC Lets use the Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio as of 09/30/2008 as an example. I will be using stocks from an article I read on Buffett which gave me this idea. See: http://seekingalpha.co m/article/115752- buffett-s-latestheadache- u-s-bancorp and http://www.hoovers.com /free/co/secdoc.xhtml? ID=10206&ipage=6253178 for the 13f. So, here is the list I used from the seekingalpha.com article. It could be any list of stocks. Notice that this particular portfolio is top heavy with KO, its largest position. So, let’s see how this portfolio looks on Excel in its present state. Or just assume you had this portfolio. Next page. Here is the same portfolio in excel format. Assuming that all the numbers are correct, it appears that this top heavy portfolio has a return of 1.22% since 1/22/09. Next page. The way I was trained to construct a portfolio by the former head of the NY Common Retirement Fund manager, Bill Hay, and the way we did it for five years, was to evenly weight the portfolio. Here it appears that the return since 1/22/2009 was 1.37%. Next page. So now, let’s further dissect this portfolio by giving each stock a score and separate the portfolio with a minimum score of 375. Here is the same portfolio graded, readjusted and separated at a score of 375 into two portfolios. For the same period, the higher scored portfolio returned 2.55% whereas the lower scored portfolio returned 0.19%. And no, this is not guaranteed. Next page. What would this new portfolio look like if we were to weight it like the first portfolio except top heavy with our highest rated stocks? Here again, the higher graded top portion returned 1.52% and the bottom portfolio returned -0.34% in the same period. So in the end, the first top heavy portfolio returned 1.27%. The same portfolio ‘equal weighted’ returned 1.37% and the ‘graded equal weighted’ portfolio returned 1.40%. After limiting the portfolio to a higher score of 375 or the top 20 stocks showed a return of 2.55% whereas the top heavy top 20 portfolio returned 1.52% for the same period. This does not mean that the graded equal weighted portfolio will always outperform the un-graded top heavy portfolio. Indeed, the top heavy portfolio could do extremely well assuming you have the right top stocks. Thank you Peter Lundstedt, CIO, Portfolio Strategist Greenwich Asset Management Group, LLC 2 Sound View Dr. Suite 100 Greenwich, CT 06830 (203) 622-1305 (866) 423-3221 Fax (203) 622-1306 Web site: www.gamgllc.com Email: gamgllc@earthlink.net Disclaimer…Peter Lundstedt is president of Greenwich Asset Management Group, LLC, (GAMGLLC), a registered investment advisor. All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Investment recommendations may change and readers are urged to check with their investment counselors before making any investment decisions. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. Peter Lundstedt and/or the staff at GAMGLLC may or may not have investments in any funds cited above. PAST RESULTS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. THERE IS RISK OF LOSS AS WELL AS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GAIN WHEN INVESTING IN MANAGED ACCOUNTS. WHEN CONSIDERING ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, INCLUDING HEDGE FUNDS, YOU SHOULD CONSIDER VARIOUS RISKS INCLUDING THE FACT THAT SOME PRODUCTS: OFTEN ENGAGE IN LEVERAGING AND OTHER SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT PRACTICES THAT MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INVESTMENT LOSS, CAN BE ILLIQUID, ARE NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PERIODIC PRICING OR VALUATION INFORMATION TO INVESTORS, MAY INVOLVE COMPLEX TAX STRUCTURES AND DELAYS IN DISTRIBUTING IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION, ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE SAME REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AS MUTUAL FUNDS, OFTEN CHARGE HIGH FEES, AND IN MANY CASES THE UNDERLYING INVESTMENTS ARE NOT TRANSPARENT AND ARE KNOWN ONLY TO THE INVESTMENT MANAGER. Communications from GAMGLLC are intended solely for informational purposes. Statements made by various authors, advertisers, sponsors and other contributors do not necessarily reflect the opinions of GAMGLLC, and should not be construed as an endorsement by GAMGLLC, either expressed or implied. GAMGLLC is not responsible for typographic errors or other inaccuracies in the content. We believe the information contained herein to be accurate and reliable. However, errors may occasionally occur. Therefore, all information and materials are provided "AS IS" without any warranty of any kind. Past results are not indicative of future results. This e-mail is not an official confirmation of terms and unless stated, is not a personal recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell. Any prices or quotations contained herein are indicative only and not for valuation purposes. If options or futures are mentioned, options, structured derivative products and futures are not suitable for all investors, and trading in these instruments is considered risky and may be appropriate only for sophisticated investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Various theoretical explanations of the risks associated with these instruments have been published. Prior to buying or selling an option, and for the complete risks relating to options, you must receive a copy of "The Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options." You may read the document at http://www.theocc.com/publications/risks/riskchap1 .jsp. We encourage readers to review our complete legal and privacy statements.
Left by Max ( track member | ignore member ) - December 18, 06:30AM


The current batch of stocks is from Q3, so for any new positions or increased positions, the stock was bought somewhere between the high and low for the quarter. Unfortunately, the SEC doesn't require filers to be any more specific than that, so that's the data that is available.
Left by neovite ( track member | ignore member ) - December 18, 05:31AM


Is there any simple way to know what price Buffett paid for the stocks, or a range of possible prices?
Left by Mustelo ( track member | ignore member ) - December 06, 04:43PM


Just to be clear; GS, CEG, and others were investments via alternative methods. Cheers!
Left by Mustelo ( track member | ignore member ) - December 05, 06:30PM


GEICO is a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway. In addition, Berkshire buys common shares and also invests money in companies via alternative methods. I attempt to post both on My Tickerspy under Berkshire Investments and Berkshire Holdings. Cheers!
Left by Jackson_Angel ( track member | ignore member ) - December 04, 05:24PM


This stuff is bogus. Where is the rest of his stocks mentioned on CNN, etc? The only stock he owns (according to this) that made a profit is Bud held in Mexico? Yeah...ughhugh.
Left by Gustavofc ( track member | ignore member ) - December 03, 01:00PM


Goldman Sachs ?
Left by Gustavofc ( track member | ignore member ) - December 03, 12:53PM


And About GEICO??? isn't he a big holder ???
Left by Jackson_Angel ( track member | ignore member ) - December 03, 08:30AM


I don't think the stock being listed here are completely accurate. Where is his major holding in CEG?
Left by yohomie_99 ( track member | ignore member ) - November 19, 03:10AM


Didn't he buy GS in the 3rd quarter? It's not on the portfolio. Is it because he bought preferred stock?
Left by Max ( track member | ignore member ) - November 04, 10:11AM


On or around November 15th (45 days after the close of Q3)
Left by MonyetTrades ( track member | ignore member ) - November 04, 08:25AM


Does anyone know when TickerSpy will update the Berkshire Hathaway portfolio to include trades made in Q3?
Left by ValueHuntr ( track member | ignore member ) - September 30, 07:35PM


mkhanarian, you are right. The reason why KO's poor performance is on reflected on tickerspy is because the website does not properly allocate proportions. It simply places equal weight to all stocks. If Buffet holds 20 stocks, each one would have an equal effect on performance (each is 1/20th of total portfolio). This is obviously not the case in the real portfolio.
Page 1 2
 
Portfolios
No portfolio available for most recent quarter

Compare Portfolios
Stocks in Common
 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Click to close X

To leave a note for yourself, fill in the message area and click "Leave a Message." To reply to the last message left on your profile, fill in the message area and click "Reply to Most Recent Message."